https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197774 An arbitral award on a monetary claim was held unsustainable where the tribunal failed to decide threshold objections on jurisdiction and limitation, both of which went to the root of maintainability. The claim had been revived after a substantial delay, yet the award gave no proper reasoning on the limitation plea or the earlier jurisdictional objection. The award was also vitiated because the arbitrator did not fairly address allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, altered banking documents, and other evidentiary objections, contrary to basic procedural fairness and natural justice. The common award was quashed and set aside. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:23:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197774 An arbitral award on a monetary claim was held unsustainable where the tribunal failed to decide threshold objections on jurisdiction and limitation, both of which went to the root of maintainability. The claim had been revived after a substantial delay, yet the award gave no proper reasoning on the limitation plea or the earlier jurisdictional objection. The award was also vitiated because the arbitrator did not fairly address allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, altered banking documents, and other evidentiary objections, contrary to basic procedural fairness and natural justice. The common award was quashed and set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197774