https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197773 A vested right to seek revision against an adverse order arises when the original proceeding is instituted, and that right is ordinarily governed by the law then in force. Applying that principle, the Court held that conversion of a society into a multi-State cooperative society did not, by itself, extinguish a pending revision under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. In the absence of any express provision or necessary implication in either the Maharashtra Act or the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, pending revision proceedings remained maintainable and were not transferred to the forum under the later Act. The revisionary authority therefore retained jurisdiction to decide the revision on merits. en-us Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:14:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197773 A vested right to seek revision against an adverse order arises when the original proceeding is instituted, and that right is ordinarily governed by the law then in force. Applying that principle, the Court held that conversion of a society into a multi-State cooperative society did not, by itself, extinguish a pending revision under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. In the absence of any express provision or necessary implication in either the Maharashtra Act or the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, pending revision proceedings remained maintainable and were not transferred to the forum under the later Act. The revisionary authority therefore retained jurisdiction to decide the revision on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197773