<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1252 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197771</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed objections raised by respondent no.5 and appointed Hon&#039;ble Ms. Justice Usha Mehra as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate a dispute between parties concerning a City Centre Project in Ludhiana. The Court held that issues of fraud and forgery fell under the arbitrator&#039;s jurisdiction as per Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:32:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1252 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197771</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed objections raised by respondent no.5 and appointed Hon&#039;ble Ms. Justice Usha Mehra as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate a dispute between parties concerning a City Centre Project in Ludhiana. The Court held that issues of fraud and forgery fell under the arbitrator&#039;s jurisdiction as per Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>