<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1611 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order that the stock taking was defective, and the goods were not liable for confiscation. Consequently, the penalties imposed were also set aside, and the respondents were entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:03:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1611 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order that the stock taking was defective, and the goods were not liable for confiscation. Consequently, the penalties imposed were also set aside, and the respondents were entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>