<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1334 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197768</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the denial of Cenvat Credit on Iron &amp;amp; Steel items used from May 2002 to May 2009. The Tribunal held that the amendment of Rule 2 (R) by the notification dated 07.07.2009 should be applied prospectively, and since the period in question preceded this notification, the appellant was entitled to the credit. The denial was overturned, and the appellant was granted the Cenvat Credit for the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 15:03:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1334 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197768</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the denial of Cenvat Credit on Iron &amp;amp; Steel items used from May 2002 to May 2009. The Tribunal held that the amendment of Rule 2 (R) by the notification dated 07.07.2009 should be applied prospectively, and since the period in question preceded this notification, the appellant was entitled to the credit. The denial was overturned, and the appellant was granted the Cenvat Credit for the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>