<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1287 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197760</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It directed a fresh verification by the AO due to discrepancies in the application of funds and the genuineness of donations by the assessee trust. The Tribunal found that the expenses claimed were not adequately supported and ordered a reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1287 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197760</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. It directed a fresh verification by the AO due to discrepancies in the application of funds and the genuineness of donations by the assessee trust. The Tribunal found that the expenses claimed were not adequately supported and ordered a reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>