<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 600 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, DELHi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197759</link>
    <description>The court found that the nominee directors of the State Government acted oppressively towards minority shareholders and against the company&#039;s interest. Specific directions were given to protect minority shareholders and ensure company functioning. The petitioners&#039; request for majority shares was denied, emphasizing the need for harmonious cooperation between parties for the company&#039;s benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 600 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, DELHi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197759</link>
      <description>The court found that the nominee directors of the State Government acted oppressively towards minority shareholders and against the company&#039;s interest. Specific directions were given to protect minority shareholders and ensure company functioning. The petitioners&#039; request for majority shares was denied, emphasizing the need for harmonious cooperation between parties for the company&#039;s benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>