<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 676 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original, and confirmed the legitimacy of the Cenvat credit on outward transportation of goods on Freight on Road (FOR) basis. The Tribunal determined that the place of removal for goods sold on FOR basis is the customer&#039;s premises, based on contractual terms and legal precedents, allowing the assessee-Appellants to avail the Cenvat credit on Service Tax paid on freight charges for FOR sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 676 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original, and confirmed the legitimacy of the Cenvat credit on outward transportation of goods on Freight on Road (FOR) basis. The Tribunal determined that the place of removal for goods sold on FOR basis is the customer&#039;s premises, based on contractual terms and legal precedents, allowing the assessee-Appellants to avail the Cenvat credit on Service Tax paid on freight charges for FOR sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>