https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197752 The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the orders of the HC's Single Judge and Division Bench, and dismissed the respondents' writ petition. It concluded that the respondents' initial appointments were illegal, violating the doctrine of equality and the Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959. The SC emphasized that equality before law cannot be used to justify or perpetuate illegal appointments, underscoring the necessity of adhering to constitutional principles and proper procedures in public employment. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197752 The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the orders of the HC's Single Judge and Division Bench, and dismissed the respondents' writ petition. It concluded that the respondents' initial appointments were illegal, violating the doctrine of equality and the Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959. The SC emphasized that equality before law cannot be used to justify or perpetuate illegal appointments, underscoring the necessity of adhering to constitutional principles and proper procedures in public employment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197752