https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197752 Public employment appointments made without advertisement, employment exchange notification, or a fair selection process offend Articles 14 and 16 and the statutory notification requirement under the Employment Exchanges Act. Such appointments do not acquire validity merely because the appointees continued in service or later regularisation was alleged. Article 14 also does not permit negative equality: a person cannot claim relief because others may have wrongly received similar benefit. The text states that regularisation cannot cure a void appointment, and parity with illegal appointments in other cases cannot create an enforceable right. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197752 Public employment appointments made without advertisement, employment exchange notification, or a fair selection process offend Articles 14 and 16 and the statutory notification requirement under the Employment Exchanges Act. Such appointments do not acquire validity merely because the appointees continued in service or later regularisation was alleged. Article 14 also does not permit negative equality: a person cannot claim relief because others may have wrongly received similar benefit. The text states that regularisation cannot cure a void appointment, and parity with illegal appointments in other cases cannot create an enforceable right. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197752