https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11431 The High Court noted that the Supreme Court had already decided the same controversy between the same parties by upholding additions on account of bogus sales and purchases. As the Tribunal's later order had been passed without noticing that binding ruling, the Revenue was held to have an available remedy by seeking rectification before the Tribunal so the earlier decision could be brought to its notice and the matter decided in accordance with law. The appeal was disposed of on that basis, with the Revenue directed to pursue rectification under section 254(2). en-us Tue, 08 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11431 The High Court noted that the Supreme Court had already decided the same controversy between the same parties by upholding additions on account of bogus sales and purchases. As the Tribunal's later order had been passed without noticing that binding ruling, the Revenue was held to have an available remedy by seeking rectification before the Tribunal so the earlier decision could be brought to its notice and the matter decided in accordance with law. The appeal was disposed of on that basis, with the Revenue directed to pursue rectification under section 254(2). Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 08 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11431