<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 661 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; findings in all aspects of the case. The reopening of the case under Section 148 was deemed valid, the addition of Rs. 13,04,274 as unexplained income was confirmed, and the denial of cross-examination was not considered prejudicial. The addition under Section 68/69 was justified, and genuine share transactions were correctly treated as accommodation entries. As a result, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 661 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; findings in all aspects of the case. The reopening of the case under Section 148 was deemed valid, the addition of Rs. 13,04,274 as unexplained income was confirmed, and the denial of cross-examination was not considered prejudicial. The addition under Section 68/69 was justified, and genuine share transactions were correctly treated as accommodation entries. As a result, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>