https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353922 The Tribunal determined that income from growing and harvesting grass was agricultural, while income from subsequent activities was business income. The case was remanded for verification and computation of agricultural income based on this distinction. The assessee was directed to provide a detailed income bifurcation. The appeal was partly allowed, with the primary grounds rejected and an alternate ground accepted. The order was pronounced on 29th December 2017. en-us Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 10:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353922 The Tribunal determined that income from growing and harvesting grass was agricultural, while income from subsequent activities was business income. The case was remanded for verification and computation of agricultural income based on this distinction. The assessee was directed to provide a detailed income bifurcation. The appeal was partly allowed, with the primary grounds rejected and an alternate ground accepted. The order was pronounced on 29th December 2017. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353922