<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 640 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on limitation grounds, finding that the demand for interest was beyond the normal limitation period prescribed under Section 11A of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitations when raising demands for duty, interest, and penalties under the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:41:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 640 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on limitation grounds, finding that the demand for interest was beyond the normal limitation period prescribed under Section 11A of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitations when raising demands for duty, interest, and penalties under the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>