https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353898 The tribunal found the demand for excise duty on inputs unsustainable due to lack of evidence of manufacturing by the appellant. While discrepancies in production figures were noted, there was insufficient evidence to prove clandestine activities. Penalties on the company and director were selectively upheld or set aside based on evidence, with the confiscation of excess finished goods being set aside. The tribunal dismissed demands for excise duty on inputs and clandestinely manufactured goods but upheld the demand for goods removed clandestinely based on transporter statements. The decision was pronounced on 09.01.2018, disposing of the appeals accordingly. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Feb 2018 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353898 The tribunal found the demand for excise duty on inputs unsustainable due to lack of evidence of manufacturing by the appellant. While discrepancies in production figures were noted, there was insufficient evidence to prove clandestine activities. Penalties on the company and director were selectively upheld or set aside based on evidence, with the confiscation of excess finished goods being set aside. The tribunal dismissed demands for excise duty on inputs and clandestinely manufactured goods but upheld the demand for goods removed clandestinely based on transporter statements. The decision was pronounced on 09.01.2018, disposing of the appeals accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353898