https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197750 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a service tax demand, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, deeming it not maintainable. The petitioner was directed to pursue the available remedy of appealing to CESTAT, as factual matters regarding the appeal timeline and receipt date of the Order-in-Original needed to be addressed through the appellate process. The petitioner was granted the option to approach CESTAT, with the exclusion of time from the writ petition filing until the receipt of the order's certified copy for limitation calculation. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:39:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197750 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a service tax demand, interest, and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, deeming it not maintainable. The petitioner was directed to pursue the available remedy of appealing to CESTAT, as factual matters regarding the appeal timeline and receipt date of the Order-in-Original needed to be addressed through the appellate process. The petitioner was granted the option to approach CESTAT, with the exclusion of time from the writ petition filing until the receipt of the order's certified copy for limitation calculation. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197750