https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197736 A person claiming under the original decree-holder may be impleaded and permitted to continue final decree proceedings in a mortgage suit where the decree has not been fully worked out. Section 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure was applied liberally to allow a transferee or assignee to proceed, and objections already decided at an earlier stage could not be reopened between stages of the same litigation by virtue of res judicata. The court also stated that mortgage law does not bar more than one final decree where the suit has not been completely disposed of, so the assignee decree-holder was entitled to proceed. en-us Thu, 09 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:47:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197736 A person claiming under the original decree-holder may be impleaded and permitted to continue final decree proceedings in a mortgage suit where the decree has not been fully worked out. Section 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure was applied liberally to allow a transferee or assignee to proceed, and objections already decided at an earlier stage could not be reopened between stages of the same litigation by virtue of res judicata. The court also stated that mortgage law does not bar more than one final decree where the suit has not been completely disposed of, so the assignee decree-holder was entitled to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197736