https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197734 The court held that the suit was barred by limitation as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that fraud prevented them from filing within the limitation period. Additionally, the court found that the communications did not constitute a valid acknowledgment of liability by the defendants. Consequently, the court dismissed the second appeal, affirming that the suit was time-barred, and no costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:32:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197734 The court held that the suit was barred by limitation as the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that fraud prevented them from filing within the limitation period. Additionally, the court found that the communications did not constitute a valid acknowledgment of liability by the defendants. Consequently, the court dismissed the second appeal, affirming that the suit was time-barred, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197734