<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (11) TMI 97 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197730</link>
    <description>An insufficiently stamped promissory note that embodies the entire loan transaction cannot be admitted to prove the debt, and the lender cannot bypass that statutory bar by relying on the original consideration where the contract is fully reduced to writing. Recovery on the underlying debt is available only if the note does not exhaust the whole agreement and the alternative character of the transaction is independently proved, such as where the note was merely collateral security or conditional payment. Equitable claims for money had and received, implied promise, unjust enrichment, or Section 70 of the Contract Act are likewise unavailable when they would require proof of the very transaction excluded from evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 12:55:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (11) TMI 97 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197730</link>
      <description>An insufficiently stamped promissory note that embodies the entire loan transaction cannot be admitted to prove the debt, and the lender cannot bypass that statutory bar by relying on the original consideration where the contract is fully reduced to writing. Recovery on the underlying debt is available only if the note does not exhaust the whole agreement and the alternative character of the transaction is independently proved, such as where the note was merely collateral security or conditional payment. Equitable claims for money had and received, implied promise, unjust enrichment, or Section 70 of the Contract Act are likewise unavailable when they would require proof of the very transaction excluded from evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>