<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court dismisses challenge to Section 9(2)(g) of Delhi VAT Act, advises petitioner to approach High Court.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37517</link>
    <description>Input tax Credit - Constitutional validity of Section 9 (2) (g) of the Delhi Value Added Tax, 2004 - Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India - failure to deposit VAT collected from its buyers, which included SCT - SC refused to interfere in the matter - SLP dismissed with the liberty to approach the HC on merit</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 12:50:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 12:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court dismisses challenge to Section 9(2)(g) of Delhi VAT Act, advises petitioner to approach High Court.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37517</link>
      <description>Input tax Credit - Constitutional validity of Section 9 (2) (g) of the Delhi Value Added Tax, 2004 - Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India - failure to deposit VAT collected from its buyers, which included SCT - SC refused to interfere in the matter - SLP dismissed with the liberty to approach the HC on merit</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 12:50:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=37517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>