<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11418</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of section 17(2)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as inserted by the Finance Act, 2001, and rule 3 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, substituted by the notification dated September 25, 2001. It dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing judicial restraint in economic regulation matters and allowing the legislature to rectify errors. The interim order was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11418</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of section 17(2)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as inserted by the Finance Act, 2001, and rule 3 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, substituted by the notification dated September 25, 2001. It dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing judicial restraint in economic regulation matters and allowing the legislature to rectify errors. The interim order was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>