https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197723 The court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, emphasizing the duty to consider limitation issues even if not raised by the defendants. The consent terms were not deemed an acknowledgment of debt under the Limitation Act, and the defendants were not estopped from pleading limitation. Section 14 of the Limitation Act was found inapplicable as the previous proceedings did not relate to the current debt recovery suit. The defendants were ordered to refund the deposited amount with interest. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jan 2018 12:11:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197723 The court dismissed the suit as barred by limitation, emphasizing the duty to consider limitation issues even if not raised by the defendants. The consent terms were not deemed an acknowledgment of debt under the Limitation Act, and the defendants were not estopped from pleading limitation. Section 14 of the Limitation Act was found inapplicable as the previous proceedings did not relate to the current debt recovery suit. The defendants were ordered to refund the deposited amount with interest. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197723