<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 595 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353859</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to grant the benefit of registration under Section 12AA for the assessment year, citing the retrospective nature of the first proviso to Section 12A(2). The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the CIT(A) was justified in directing the AO to grant the benefit of registration under Section 12AA. The AO was permitted to conduct a fresh assessment in compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 595 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353859</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to grant the benefit of registration under Section 12AA for the assessment year, citing the retrospective nature of the first proviso to Section 12A(2). The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the CIT(A) was justified in directing the AO to grant the benefit of registration under Section 12AA. The AO was permitted to conduct a fresh assessment in compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>