<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 585 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation for a 64-day delay in filing cross-objections by the assessee. It held that assessments under Section 153A without incriminating material from a search operation were invalid. Additionally, it ruled that assessment proceedings under Section 143(2) abated once the time limit for issuing notice expired, preventing the reopening of concluded assessments. The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the Revenue and cross-objections by the assessee, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 585 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation for a 64-day delay in filing cross-objections by the assessee. It held that assessments under Section 153A without incriminating material from a search operation were invalid. Additionally, it ruled that assessment proceedings under Section 143(2) abated once the time limit for issuing notice expired, preventing the reopening of concluded assessments. The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the Revenue and cross-objections by the assessee, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>