<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 580 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of a major addition of Rs. 1,97,55,357, agreeing with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) that the Assessing Officer failed to reject the books of accounts or identify significant defects. The Tribunal acknowledged the consistency in the appellant&#039;s net profit rates but reduced the confirmed disallowance from Rs. 15,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 to maintain alignment with subsequent assessments, partially allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The final order was issued on November 2, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 580 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of a major addition of Rs. 1,97,55,357, agreeing with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) that the Assessing Officer failed to reject the books of accounts or identify significant defects. The Tribunal acknowledged the consistency in the appellant&#039;s net profit rates but reduced the confirmed disallowance from Rs. 15,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 to maintain alignment with subsequent assessments, partially allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The final order was issued on November 2, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>