<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 572 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353836</link>
    <description>Imported Reishi Gano Powder and Ganocelium Powder were held not to satisfy the common parlance test for medicaments, because their labels and promotional material showed general health supplementation rather than treatment or prevention of any specific ailment. The Tribunal also held that the description of the goods as Ayurvedic products, the existence of a drug licence, and generic references in Ayurvedic texts were not decisive for customs classification. The preparations were therefore correctly classified as food supplements rather than Ayurvedic Proprietary Medicine, and the importer&#039;s classification claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 572 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353836</link>
      <description>Imported Reishi Gano Powder and Ganocelium Powder were held not to satisfy the common parlance test for medicaments, because their labels and promotional material showed general health supplementation rather than treatment or prevention of any specific ailment. The Tribunal also held that the description of the goods as Ayurvedic products, the existence of a drug licence, and generic references in Ayurvedic texts were not decisive for customs classification. The preparations were therefore correctly classified as food supplements rather than Ayurvedic Proprietary Medicine, and the importer&#039;s classification claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>