<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 569 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353833</link>
    <description>Export classification of basmati rice must be tested against the governing schedule under the Basmati Rice (Export) Grading and Marketing Rules, 1975. Where the sample contains other rice grains, including red grains, beyond the permissible threshold, the consignment loses basmati status and may be treated as non-basmati rice, supporting confiscation. On proportional relief, redemption fine may be reduced having regard to the value of the consignment, while penalties require separate scrutiny: a unit penalty may be sustained, but an additional penalty on a director is not justified where the same conduct has already been penalised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 569 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353833</link>
      <description>Export classification of basmati rice must be tested against the governing schedule under the Basmati Rice (Export) Grading and Marketing Rules, 1975. Where the sample contains other rice grains, including red grains, beyond the permissible threshold, the consignment loses basmati status and may be treated as non-basmati rice, supporting confiscation. On proportional relief, redemption fine may be reduced having regard to the value of the consignment, while penalties require separate scrutiny: a unit penalty may be sustained, but an additional penalty on a director is not justified where the same conduct has already been penalised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>