https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353830 Full and frank disclosure is mandatory in writ jurisdiction; the Court treated suppression of material facts, including undisclosed contractual and correspondence material, as fatal to the petition. Availability of an alternative remedy did not by itself bar judicial review because the challenge went to statutory competence and validity. On the SEZ issue, a short gas pipeline intended only for supply to a particular unit was held not to be an infrastructure facility requiring prior Board of Approval clearance. The Approval Committee's approval was therefore treated as within the statutory framework, and the challenge failed. en-us Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:51:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353830 Full and frank disclosure is mandatory in writ jurisdiction; the Court treated suppression of material facts, including undisclosed contractual and correspondence material, as fatal to the petition. Availability of an alternative remedy did not by itself bar judicial review because the challenge went to statutory competence and validity. On the SEZ issue, a short gas pipeline intended only for supply to a particular unit was held not to be an infrastructure facility requiring prior Board of Approval clearance. The Approval Committee's approval was therefore treated as within the statutory framework, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353830