https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353827 Delay in filing the next appeal could not be assessed in isolation where the appellant had been diligently pursuing remedies before the first appellate authority. The court noted that the first appellate order had been passed ex parte and there was no adequate material showing effective notice or hearing on merits. In that context, the Tribunal's dismissal for delay was not justified, and the matter was restored for reconsideration of condonation as well as fresh adjudication after notice and hearing. en-us Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353827 Delay in filing the next appeal could not be assessed in isolation where the appellant had been diligently pursuing remedies before the first appellate authority. The court noted that the first appellate order had been passed ex parte and there was no adequate material showing effective notice or hearing on merits. In that context, the Tribunal's dismissal for delay was not justified, and the matter was restored for reconsideration of condonation as well as fresh adjudication after notice and hearing. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353827