<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 555 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353819</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition and declined to interfere with the impugned HC order upholding the constitutional validity of Section 9(2)(g) of the Delhi VAT Act, 2004 as challenged under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The challenge concerned denial of input tax credit where VAT collected, including an additional tax component, was not deposited into government accounts. The petitioners&#039; contention was rejected and the HC decision was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 10:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 555 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353819</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition and declined to interfere with the impugned HC order upholding the constitutional validity of Section 9(2)(g) of the Delhi VAT Act, 2004 as challenged under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The challenge concerned denial of input tax credit where VAT collected, including an additional tax component, was not deposited into government accounts. The petitioners&#039; contention was rejected and the HC decision was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>