https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353815 The Division Bench reserved orders on the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and the interpretation of its provisions. The Bench directed both parties to submit written notes of arguments and relevant case law within ten days, maintaining the interim orders' status quo. The Bench clarified that it would not address the merits of individual cases, leaving that to roster Benches. An order copy was to be provided Dasti under the Court Master's signature. en-us Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Jan 2018 08:48:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353815 The Division Bench reserved orders on the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and the interpretation of its provisions. The Bench directed both parties to submit written notes of arguments and relevant case law within ten days, maintaining the interim orders' status quo. The Bench clarified that it would not address the merits of individual cases, leaving that to roster Benches. An order copy was to be provided Dasti under the Court Master's signature. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 06 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353815