https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197715 Damages were held unavailable for Customs detention where the detention was by Customs authorities and not by the rival trader, and the claim was also time-barred under the applicable limitation article. No independent damages claim lay for instituting or prosecuting civil suits, threats of litigation, or obtaining an interim injunction, absent proof that the suits were brought without belief in the claim or for an improper purpose; recovery for the injunction had to proceed through the undertaking given to the court. The claim for slander of goods also failed because the pleadings lacked particulars, actionable false statements and special damage were not proved, and comparative trade puffing was not enough. en-us Fri, 21 Jan 1927 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:28:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197715 Damages were held unavailable for Customs detention where the detention was by Customs authorities and not by the rival trader, and the claim was also time-barred under the applicable limitation article. No independent damages claim lay for instituting or prosecuting civil suits, threats of litigation, or obtaining an interim injunction, absent proof that the suits were brought without belief in the claim or for an improper purpose; recovery for the injunction had to proceed through the undertaking given to the court. The claim for slander of goods also failed because the pleadings lacked particulars, actionable false statements and special damage were not proved, and comparative trade puffing was not enough. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Jan 1927 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197715