<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197713</link>
    <description>A plaintiff is ordinarily dominus litis, but a court may add a party under Order I Rule 10 CPC only where that person is necessary or proper for complete and effective adjudication. The test is a direct legal interest in the subject matter of the suit, not merely a commercial interest or evidentiary connection. In a challenge to a municipal demolition notice concerning alleged unauthorised structures, the second respondent had no direct legal interest in the demolition issue and any grievance against the appellant arose from a separate cause of action. Its impleadment was therefore not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197713</link>
      <description>A plaintiff is ordinarily dominus litis, but a court may add a party under Order I Rule 10 CPC only where that person is necessary or proper for complete and effective adjudication. The test is a direct legal interest in the subject matter of the suit, not merely a commercial interest or evidentiary connection. In a challenge to a municipal demolition notice concerning alleged unauthorised structures, the second respondent had no direct legal interest in the demolition issue and any grievance against the appellant arose from a separate cause of action. Its impleadment was therefore not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>