<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 713 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197709</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the respondents, dismissing the petition and vacating all interim orders. However, the court acknowledged the petitioner&#039;s willingness to exit the company and suggested a buyout of the petitioner&#039;s shares based on a valuation conducted by an independent valuer, with costs shared equally between the petitioner and the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:32:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 713 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197709</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the respondents, dismissing the petition and vacating all interim orders. However, the court acknowledged the petitioner&#039;s willingness to exit the company and suggested a buyout of the petitioner&#039;s shares based on a valuation conducted by an independent valuer, with costs shared equally between the petitioner and the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>