https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197706 Interim trade mark protection was continued and made absolute in the plaintiff's injunction application, while the connected injunction proceedings were disposed of on the basis of the parties' statements and directions in the suit. The defendants 1 to 3 were proceeded ex parte, defendant No. 4 filed a written statement, and the court also recorded the plaintiff's statement that it had no intention to assign the trade mark to any third party. That statement was directed to operate during the pendency of the suit. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:26:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197706 Interim trade mark protection was continued and made absolute in the plaintiff's injunction application, while the connected injunction proceedings were disposed of on the basis of the parties' statements and directions in the suit. The defendants 1 to 3 were proceeded ex parte, defendant No. 4 filed a written statement, and the court also recorded the plaintiff's statement that it had no intention to assign the trade mark to any third party. That statement was directed to operate during the pendency of the suit. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197706