https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197705 The Court held that the writ petition challenging the Constitution (Sixty-Fourth Amendment) Bill, 1989, was premature and not maintainable. It emphasized that Parliament's legislative competency should not be interfered with at the Bill stage, stating that any challenge to the Bill can only occur once it becomes law. The Court dismissed the petition, noting that personal allegations against Mr. Rajiv Gandhi were irrelevant and appeared to be political in nature. en-us Wed, 09 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197705 The Court held that the writ petition challenging the Constitution (Sixty-Fourth Amendment) Bill, 1989, was premature and not maintainable. It emphasized that Parliament's legislative competency should not be interfered with at the Bill stage, stating that any challenge to the Bill can only occur once it becomes law. The Court dismissed the petition, noting that personal allegations against Mr. Rajiv Gandhi were irrelevant and appeared to be political in nature. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197705