https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197704 The court rejected the writ petition challenging the proposed agreement of "Darjeeling Gurkha Hill Council," citing its premature nature as the memorandum of settlement required legislation for enforcement. The court also deemed the issue of using the term "Gurkha" premature and emphasized the petitioners' right to challenge legislation if enacted. It held that political questions were generally non-justiciable and within the realm of the Central Government. The court affirmed the executive's power in entering the memorandum but required legislative approval for legal effect. No costs were awarded, and the petitioners were advised to challenge any subsequent legislation. en-us Mon, 22 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197704 The court rejected the writ petition challenging the proposed agreement of "Darjeeling Gurkha Hill Council," citing its premature nature as the memorandum of settlement required legislation for enforcement. The court also deemed the issue of using the term "Gurkha" premature and emphasized the petitioners' right to challenge legislation if enacted. It held that political questions were generally non-justiciable and within the realm of the Central Government. The court affirmed the executive's power in entering the memorandum but required legislative approval for legal effect. No costs were awarded, and the petitioners were advised to challenge any subsequent legislation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197704