https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197700 The High Court reversed the trial court's decision to grant eviction in a case where a landlady sought possession of a shop for her son's embroidery business. The High Court found that the landlady's proposal to merge a neighboring shop with the disputed premises was not supported by genuine need and went beyond the pleadings. The court noted the similarity in sizes of the vacated shop and the disputed one, concluding that the landlady had acquired a shop almost equal in size during the proceedings. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing the importance of establishing a genuine bona fide need for eviction in landlord-tenant disputes. en-us Thu, 06 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:25:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197700 The High Court reversed the trial court's decision to grant eviction in a case where a landlady sought possession of a shop for her son's embroidery business. The High Court found that the landlady's proposal to merge a neighboring shop with the disputed premises was not supported by genuine need and went beyond the pleadings. The court noted the similarity in sizes of the vacated shop and the disputed one, concluding that the landlady had acquired a shop almost equal in size during the proceedings. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing the importance of establishing a genuine bona fide need for eviction in landlord-tenant disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197700