https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197697 Chapter III of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960, as amended, was protected by Article 31A(1) because its provisions on resumption for personal cultivation, compensation, and the resulting adjustment of landlord and tenant rights substantially modified rights in estate land; the constitutional challenge therefore failed. Chapter IV, however, had not been brought into force, so its validity was not ripe for adjudication and could not properly be decided at that stage. The second proviso to Article 31A(1) did not require market value compensation, because the relevant ceiling-based acquisition conditions were not attracted on the facts. The High Court's ruling was accordingly interfered with. en-us Fri, 05 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:00:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197697 Chapter III of the Orissa Land Reforms Act, 1960, as amended, was protected by Article 31A(1) because its provisions on resumption for personal cultivation, compensation, and the resulting adjustment of landlord and tenant rights substantially modified rights in estate land; the constitutional challenge therefore failed. Chapter IV, however, had not been brought into force, so its validity was not ripe for adjudication and could not properly be decided at that stage. The second proviso to Article 31A(1) did not require market value compensation, because the relevant ceiling-based acquisition conditions were not attracted on the facts. The High Court's ruling was accordingly interfered with. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 05 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197697