https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197695 The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the plaintiffs, acting as commission agents and consignees, lacked the standing to pursue compensation for the loss of goods. The court found that consignees, not being owners of the goods, could not maintain a suit for damages. The appeal was rejected, and costs were awarded against the plaintiffs. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:27:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197695 The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the plaintiffs, acting as commission agents and consignees, lacked the standing to pursue compensation for the loss of goods. The court found that consignees, not being owners of the goods, could not maintain a suit for damages. The appeal was rejected, and costs were awarded against the plaintiffs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Apr 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197695