https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353812 The Tribunal affirmed that the Income Tax Officer (Intelligence) had jurisdiction to issue notices under Section 133(6) after obtaining approval. The penalty orders were deemed timely under Section 275(1)(c), and no reasonable cause for non-furnishing information was found, upholding penalties under Section 272A(2)(c). All 21 appeals were dismissed. en-us Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jan 2018 12:44:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353812 The Tribunal affirmed that the Income Tax Officer (Intelligence) had jurisdiction to issue notices under Section 133(6) after obtaining approval. The penalty orders were deemed timely under Section 275(1)(c), and no reasonable cause for non-furnishing information was found, upholding penalties under Section 272A(2)(c). All 21 appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353812