<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 623 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197684</link>
    <description>A signed statement of account acknowledging a definite liability and admitted balance due may constitute a written contract for purposes of Order 37 CPC, allowing a summary suit on the debt. Where the documents show mutual accounting, a subsisting obligation to pay, and part-payments consistent with the admitted liability, the claim is treated as maintainable under the summary procedure. A defendant is not entitled to leave to defend when the pleaded version of adjustment or oral arrangement is unsupported by particulars and does not disclose a real triable issue; a sham or moonshine defence will not suffice. The revision was interfered with only conditionally, subject to furnishing a bank guarantee within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 623 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197684</link>
      <description>A signed statement of account acknowledging a definite liability and admitted balance due may constitute a written contract for purposes of Order 37 CPC, allowing a summary suit on the debt. Where the documents show mutual accounting, a subsisting obligation to pay, and part-payments consistent with the admitted liability, the claim is treated as maintainable under the summary procedure. A defendant is not entitled to leave to defend when the pleaded version of adjustment or oral arrangement is unsupported by particulars and does not disclose a real triable issue; a sham or moonshine defence will not suffice. The revision was interfered with only conditionally, subject to furnishing a bank guarantee within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>