<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 41 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11398</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, holding that the disallowance under Section 40A(3) was incorrect. The court found that all payments were made by account payee cheques, meeting the requirements of Rule 6DD exceptions. Transactions were deemed genuine, complying with the legislative intent to prevent tax evasion. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing the importance of verifying transaction genuineness. The reference was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 41 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11398</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, holding that the disallowance under Section 40A(3) was incorrect. The court found that all payments were made by account payee cheques, meeting the requirements of Rule 6DD exceptions. Transactions were deemed genuine, complying with the legislative intent to prevent tax evasion. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing the importance of verifying transaction genuineness. The reference was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>