<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 524 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353788</link>
    <description>Area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003 on factory expansion could not be denied on the basis of unverified doubts, certificate discrepancies, or presumed deficiencies. The Tribunal noted that the central question was whether the claimed capacity expansion had actually occurred, and held that the department was expected to verify matters such as check-post movement, power load, transformer changes, and related certificates rather than rely on theoretical calculations or suspicions. Applying its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case for an earlier period, the Tribunal found the denial unsustainable and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 08:06:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 524 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353788</link>
      <description>Area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003 on factory expansion could not be denied on the basis of unverified doubts, certificate discrepancies, or presumed deficiencies. The Tribunal noted that the central question was whether the claimed capacity expansion had actually occurred, and held that the department was expected to verify matters such as check-post movement, power load, transformer changes, and related certificates rather than rely on theoretical calculations or suspicions. Applying its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case for an earlier period, the Tribunal found the denial unsustainable and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>