<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 502 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353766</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the application of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) to the petitioners. It upheld the objection based on the Supreme Court&#039;s directions, stating that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to interfere or grant interim relief. The Court emphasized that the issues should be addressed by the authorities under the PMLA and the Special Court in Delhi, in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s directives. The petitions were dismissed, vacating the interim orders, and the Court clarified that its decision would not impact the pending appeal or prosecutions before the Special Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 502 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353766</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the application of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) to the petitioners. It upheld the objection based on the Supreme Court&#039;s directions, stating that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to interfere or grant interim relief. The Court emphasized that the issues should be addressed by the authorities under the PMLA and the Special Court in Delhi, in accordance with the Supreme Court&#039;s directives. The petitions were dismissed, vacating the interim orders, and the Court clarified that its decision would not impact the pending appeal or prosecutions before the Special Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>