https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197661 The Court found that the defendant's use of the trademark/logo 'LNT' was likely to create confusion and was not bonafide. The defendant was not allowed to use 'LNT' in an extended form to avoid confusion as it conflicted with the plaintiff's association with 'LandT' and 'ELENTE'. Despite dissimilar products, the Court held that the likelihood of confusion was the key factor. The appeal was allowed, and the defendant was restrained from using 'LNT/ELENTE' or similar names, except for 'Lachmi Narain Trades' in full form for marketing. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 17:27:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197661 The Court found that the defendant's use of the trademark/logo 'LNT' was likely to create confusion and was not bonafide. The defendant was not allowed to use 'LNT' in an extended form to avoid confusion as it conflicted with the plaintiff's association with 'LandT' and 'ELENTE'. Despite dissimilar products, the Court held that the likelihood of confusion was the key factor. The appeal was allowed, and the defendant was restrained from using 'LNT/ELENTE' or similar names, except for 'Lachmi Narain Trades' in full form for marketing. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197661