https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197657 Territorial jurisdiction under the Trade Marks Act was rejected where the plaint did not show the plaintiff's business presence in Delhi by office, residence, or pleaded commercial activity through a licensee or distributor. The invoices relied on showed only isolated dispatches of goods to Delhi and did not establish that the defendant was carrying on business there or that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within the forum. A mere availability of goods or a trivial, incidental link with Delhi was held insufficient to confer jurisdiction. The objection to territorial jurisdiction was sustained, and the suit was held not maintainable in Delhi. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:36:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197657 Territorial jurisdiction under the Trade Marks Act was rejected where the plaint did not show the plaintiff's business presence in Delhi by office, residence, or pleaded commercial activity through a licensee or distributor. The invoices relied on showed only isolated dispatches of goods to Delhi and did not establish that the defendant was carrying on business there or that a substantial part of the cause of action arose within the forum. A mere availability of goods or a trivial, incidental link with Delhi was held insufficient to confer jurisdiction. The objection to territorial jurisdiction was sustained, and the suit was held not maintainable in Delhi. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197657