<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 691 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197655</link>
    <description>A university Vice-Chancellor may exercise express or implied supervisory powers to order re-verification, re-valuation or re-examination of answer scripts where the statutory scheme permits and the action is not arbitrary, unreasonable or mala fide. At the same time, a revised result based on a pressure-induced, limited and unreliable re-verification process may be cancelled by the competent academic authority. On the facts noted, the Executive Council was justified in disapproving the exercise, cancelling the revised results and directing failed students to reappear, while a supplementary examination was upheld as appropriate relief for affected students.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 691 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197655</link>
      <description>A university Vice-Chancellor may exercise express or implied supervisory powers to order re-verification, re-valuation or re-examination of answer scripts where the statutory scheme permits and the action is not arbitrary, unreasonable or mala fide. At the same time, a revised result based on a pressure-induced, limited and unreliable re-verification process may be cancelled by the competent academic authority. On the facts noted, the Executive Council was justified in disapproving the exercise, cancelling the revised results and directing failed students to reappear, while a supplementary examination was upheld as appropriate relief for affected students.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>