https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197651 Proceedings under Section 5(i) of the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951 do not attain finality without the confirmation required by the statutory scheme, and a Collector's order alone cannot be treated as conclusive. A prior writ judgment limited to the legality of the Collector's jurisdiction did not finally determine the genuineness of the 1933 lease, tenant status, or deemed tenancy under Section 8(1). The Court also treated allegations of fraud, tampering, and suppression as material because fraud can vitiate consequential orders. The impugned judgment was set aside to the necessary extent and the matter remitted for fresh consideration. en-us Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:54:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197651 Proceedings under Section 5(i) of the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951 do not attain finality without the confirmation required by the statutory scheme, and a Collector's order alone cannot be treated as conclusive. A prior writ judgment limited to the legality of the Collector's jurisdiction did not finally determine the genuineness of the 1933 lease, tenant status, or deemed tenancy under Section 8(1). The Court also treated allegations of fraud, tampering, and suppression as material because fraud can vitiate consequential orders. The impugned judgment was set aside to the necessary extent and the matter remitted for fresh consideration. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197651