<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1286 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197647</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of maintaining confidentiality in mediation proceedings, directing that details should not be disclosed to the public. The Court outlined that successful mediations should only result in the agreement being sent to the Court without discussion details, while failed mediations should be reported as unsuccessful without further information. The Court warned that revealing mediation discussions could breach confidentiality and ordered compliance with these guidelines by sending a copy of the order to mediation centers. Further proceedings were scheduled for January 2011 at the request of the Appellants&#039; counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:38:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1286 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197647</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of maintaining confidentiality in mediation proceedings, directing that details should not be disclosed to the public. The Court outlined that successful mediations should only result in the agreement being sent to the Court without discussion details, while failed mediations should be reported as unsuccessful without further information. The Court warned that revealing mediation discussions could breach confidentiality and ordered compliance with these guidelines by sending a copy of the order to mediation centers. Further proceedings were scheduled for January 2011 at the request of the Appellants&#039; counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>