https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197645 A reasoned finding of fact on lineage and title, supported by survey records, raiyatbari entries and rent receipts, was treated as immune from interference in second appeal because it was neither perverse nor based on no evidence. The objection under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act was also held unavailable when first raised in second appeal, and a bare suit for declaration remained maintainable because the plaintiffs were found to be in possession. Mutation proceedings were noted as not determining title or displacing existing proprietary rights. The stated effect was that the plaintiffs' title and possession stood established and the challenge in second appeal failed. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:23:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197645 A reasoned finding of fact on lineage and title, supported by survey records, raiyatbari entries and rent receipts, was treated as immune from interference in second appeal because it was neither perverse nor based on no evidence. The objection under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act was also held unavailable when first raised in second appeal, and a bare suit for declaration remained maintainable because the plaintiffs were found to be in possession. Mutation proceedings were noted as not determining title or displacing existing proprietary rights. The stated effect was that the plaintiffs' title and possession stood established and the challenge in second appeal failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 13 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197645